Talk:Year of the Black Rainbow
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Here We Are Juggernaut
[edit]I keep seeing this put up as their first single for Year of the Black Rainbow. But as far as I know it has not been confirmed and is only a rumor. Source?
Source: http://www.amazon.com/Here-We-Are-Juggernaut/dp/B003A7L0FY/ref=dm_ap_alb14 — Frozentoast (talk) 07:57, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
The Broken
[edit]The link for The Broken leads to a disambiguation page, which leads to the YOTBR page. I'm removing it, but feel free to rollback if I'm in error. --Sigafoos (talk) 12:57, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Track Lengths
[edit]Are there any other sources that confirm Allmusic's track lengths for the songs? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drbenevl (talk • contribs) 04:02, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- Those are the lengths on the (CD quality) leak as well, so they would appear to be correct. The album leaked several weeks ago. Ringer7 (talk) 04:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Spin Review
[edit]I'm not sure Spin's review should really be included. It's not really a review at all.192.138.178.107 (talk) 15:20, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
I agree, the Spin review is an embarrassment for any form of music critique. LD18 (talk) 19:16, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Along the same lines, I feel that The Guardian's review shouldn't really be included...it's little more than a paragraph, and is no where near being a comprehensive review. Much like the Spin review, I feel that it is also an embarrassment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.3.167.51 (talk) 00:42, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
I agree about the spin review. However, the Guardian review, although short, is still coherent and better edited. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drbenevl (talk • contribs) 03:32, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Perhaps you're right; it just feels like he (or she) hardly spends any time critiquing the album itself. Two songs are mentioned in the whole thing, and the rest seems to be more of a shot at the fanbase instead. I suppose that's just my opinion, though.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Year of the Black Rainbow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100212152208/http://www.shockhound.com:80/albums/497861-coheed-and-cambria-mp3s-the-broken to http://www.shockhound.com/albums/497861-coheed-and-cambria-mp3s-the-broken
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100220020607/http://www.coheedandcambria.com:80/us/news/our-first-us-headline-tour-over-2-years to http://www.coheedandcambria.com/us/news/our-first-us-headline-tour-over-2-years
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:59, 29 January 2016 (UTC)