Talk:Year of Wonders
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 2 April 2012. Further details are available here. |
![]() | This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
hellooo
Yllosubmarine (talk · contribs) wrote on my talk page regarding the lengthy novel summary I'd written. Given the complexity of the novel and how much I'd already whittled down from the book itself, I am having a hard time summarising it further. Thus, I leave it open to others to edit it so that it meets {{plot}} standard. Jessica Schmidt 02:42, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- I have rated this as a stub as this article is almost exclusively "Plot" and there is little else. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 11:31, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- The "Plot" section needs to be cut down by at least two thirds. I haven't read the book or I would attempt it myself. It is waaaay too long at present - few are going to struggle through that text as it stands. Badgerpatrol (talk) 17:18, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
I absolutely agree the "plot" section is way too detailed. I just heard the story serialised on radio so am not familiar enough to provide the summary myself, but will do so if I can get a copy to read Feroshki (talk) 03:46, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Plot section
[edit]As others have said, it's way too long. But also, it should be in paragraphs. I hope spmepne who's read it will be able to fix it up. Tlqk56 (talk) 00:32, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Citations
[edit]The "reception" and "themes" sections are badly in need of citations. I'm adding some more from sources I can find, but I haven't been able to track down any of the named reviewers in the existing article. SarahTheEntwife (talk) 23:40, 6 February 2014 (UTC)