Talk:Yeah 3x/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk2me) 06:26, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Infobox
- No issues
- Lead
- An accompanying music video was directed by Colin Tilley and filmed at the Universal Studios. – Remove "the"
- ...in a neighborhood of old-timey storefronts... – Use a different phrase beside "old timey"
- Background and recording
- No issues
- Composition
- According to the sheet music published at Musicnotes.com by Universal Music Publishing Group... – Publisher is actually Sony/ATV Music Publishing
- Critical reception
- Megan Vick from Billboard Magazine added... – "Magazine" does not need to be capitalized
- Chart performance
- No issues
- Music video
- The music video for "Yeah 3x" was directed by Colin Tilley and filmed at the Universal Studios. – Remove "the" before "music video"
- Live performances
- No issues
- Track listing
- No issues
- Credits and personnel
- Instead of using the small dash (-) between the personnel, use the bigger dash (–)
- Charts and certifications
- No issues
- Radio and release history
- No issues
- See also
- No issues
- References
- Use
{{reflist|4}}to organize section better - References 3, 6, 45, 50, 54 – Rap-Up does not need to be wiki-linked because it is already wiki-linked in Reference 2
- References 8, 9, 47 – "MTV News" and "MTV Network" should not be wiki-linked because they are already done so earlier
- Reference 11 – "Musicnotes.com" should not be italicized because it is not a print source
- References 18, 28 – "Yahoo! Music" should not be italicized because it is not a print source
- References 22, 25, 26, 49 – "Billboard" and "Prometheus Global Media" should not be wiki-linked per above
- Reference 28 – Should not be wiki-linked because it is already used in references section
- Reference 48 – Idolator does not need to be wiki-linked per above
Done
Overall review
[edit]After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold. It is a very nice article and is close to reaching good article status. However, there are mistakes above affecting the prose quality of the article as well as the "References" section, which needs some work. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or discuss the items you believe do not affect good article status until a consensus is reached. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 16:17, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- Since all of the issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 01:57, 8 August 2011 (UTC)