Jump to content

Talk:Yasser Al-Habib

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Arabic wiki as a source

[edit]

I removed a reference linking to the Arabic version of wiki, since it was a violation of WP:CIRCULAR. VQuakr (talk) 19:16, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

this link maybe a little bit helpfull interpol--نسر برلين (talk) 19:56, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Where can he be found?

[edit]

I was just wondering where he can be found... I've been hearing in London? but where in London? I've been hearing Mohsen Mosque (Mohsen Masjid) but where is that in London? Thanks

File:A-romanian-convertor.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:A-romanian-convertor.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:09, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:DemonstrationEgEmbassyLondon1.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:DemonstrationEgEmbassyLondon1.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:10, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alshab-Kuwait.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Alshab-Kuwait.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:10, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

[edit]

We need a picture of him!--88.111.117.148 (talk) 17:43, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of contents without reliable sources

[edit]

the-drop.net

[edit]

While this article is about Yasser Al-Habib, It had been used the office of Sheikh Al-Habib in London as source for Some of the contents of the article. So this web site is considered as a primary source. According to Wikipedia:No original research, It isn't allowed. I removed sentences that is referred to it. Some of them are actually invalid.

wtop.com

[edit]

This page is not found. So i removed the sentence that referred to it.Samaneh-davoudi (talk) 09:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @MezzoMezzo:! I explained my reasons to delete some of contents of article at above and i repeat again for you:


  • 1)

Consider this reference (the third reference in the article) that's one page of alqatrah.net. This page is referred to the page which is included one question and answer. The important issue is that the person who answer to the question or the reference of the answer is not clear and the accuracy of answer is dialectical. So this isn't reliable.

  • 2)

Consider this reference (the fourth reference in the article) that's one page of alqatrah.net. This page is included contents that dose not have author or reference and the accuracy of contents is dialectical. So it is not reliable.

  • 3)

The fifth reference is like number 1.

  • 4)

The seventh reference is like number 2.

  • 5)

The 10th reference and the 11th reference is not found.

  • 6)

The last two reference are from "the drop/alqatrah.net" that is for Yasser Al-Habib and like number 2.

According to above explanations, i am sure that statements that have been attributed to these resources, must to be deleted.Samaneh-davoudi (talk) 10:40, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing wrong with using the subject's own article as long as it is only used as a source about the subject himself - see WP:SELFSOURCE. Additionally, none of the claims here are disputed - anyone who knows the subject knows that the information in the article is accurate.
As for the references not being found, then one of the opening lines of the WP:LINKROT guide is that we should not delete information cited by a dead link; there are ways to fix that.
Additionally, information apparently cited with Amnesty International USA was deleted along with the source itself.
The end result is that, from the outside looking in, the deletions here appeared wildly inappropriate and without a proper policy-based reasoning. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:51, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@MezzoMezzo:, I can't understand your mean by this sentence Additionally, none of the claims here are disputed - anyone who knows the subject knows that the information in the article is accurate. why do we use references at wikipedia? we use of reliable source to show that our contents is accurate.
At Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons you can see this sentence Remove contentious material that is unsourced or poorly sourced!I have faith that the pages of the office of sheikh al-habib is not reliable source at wikipedia. My problem is not that the website is for al-habib and it had been used as source at his article, although i think that the use of primary sources is misused . The main problem is that the pages of sheikh al-habib website do not contain valid data. Some of them are question and answer and there is any information about the person who answers the question.
about dead links, you are right. I must to be careful. Thanks!Samaneh-davoudi (talk) 11:18, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Yasser Al-Habib. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:05, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Khoddam Al-Mahdi Organization

[edit]

The lead refers to the Khoddam Al-Mahdi Organization in the present tense but this rs suggests that it "ceased to exist" in 2014.[1]. Tigerboy1966  06:32, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:52, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]