Jump to content

Talk:Yank Adams/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AGK (talk · contribs) 00:56, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Concisely written; flows well.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Meets WP:V; no obvious factual errors or content of questionable accuracy.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Covers all aspects of the subject matter in adequate depth.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Satisfies WP:NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    No ongoing edit wars or substantial expansion of the article. Incident is not a current one and is not rapidly unfolding.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Sensible and engaging use of images.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: