Talk:Yakovlev Yak-140/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Buidhe (talk · contribs) 23:19, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

• Article meets requirements; I made a few tweaks to the prose.
• Gordon has multiple authors, so et al. should be used in footnotes.
• Is there a citation for the aircraft in see also being "Aircraft of comparable role, configuration and era"? (t · c) buidhe 23:19, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
  • No citations are needed for a see also section. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:03, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
    • WP:V states, "All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists and captions, must be verifiable." Since this is in mainspace, there should be some way that I, a reader, is able to verify in a reliable source that these other aircraft are of a "comparable role, configuration and era". (t · c) buidhe 00:11, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
      • The problem is that "comparable role, configuration and era" is a judgement call, one that authors generally don't bother with, so it's not citable. This has led to edit wars over which aircraft should be included as it's entirely subjective. I've deleted it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:17, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
        • @Buidhe:--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:59, 28 August 2020 (UTC)