Talk:Yajurveda

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Yajurveda article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

India Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hinduism High‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

I am born Bramhin

I am born Bramhin. I am Kanyakubja Bramhin. My gotra is Upamanyu. I write my surname "Bajpai". Some writes "Vajpayee" / "vajpai" / "Vajpeyi" etc. It dose not matter, who is writting in english language the word Vajpeya. My priest told me that your veda is Yajurveda and this is the veda for all bajpais.

user:Dbbajpai1945@sify.com 10:59 PM IST 02 September 2006

Source for age

I've just reverted a rather implausible change to the age of the manuscript, but I see that the age given in the article currently is cited to Witzel (1991), which is missing from the list of sources. Is this a typo or a genuine omission? The same source is used in Atharvaveda and Rigveda, and is missing from both of those articles too. Pinging @Joshua Jonathan. Thanks, Wham2001 (talk) 10:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Wham2001: * Witzel, Michael (2001), "Autochthonous Aryans? The Evidence from Old Indian and Iranian Texts" (PDF), Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies, 7 (3): 1–115 p.5. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 11:18, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect, thank-you! I have made the necessary updates. Best, Wham2001 (talk) 17:11, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please correct the errors in the article.

This article makes a lot of confusing and possibly erroneous claims. One which is definitely wrong is the claim that the Shatapatha Brahmana is a part of the yajurveda. This is patently false. It is a commentary/manual text on the yajurveda but it is a separate text. It also states that the upanishads are a part of the YV, which is also likewise just as false. It makes understanding the article very difficult. Please correct it. 2409:4042:4E8E:E9A8:0:0:EA48:720D (talk) 14:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Arjuna followed the horse used for Aswameda Yaga.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:56, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perspective ambiguity

This discussion has been disrupted by block evasion, ban evasion, or sockpuppetry from the following user:

Rajeshfadnavis (talk · contribs · block log · spi)

Comments from this user should be excluded from assessments of consensus.

Here it seems like the perspective is completely Western so we can add native perspective along with the existing perspective. Ex:Arya is a race in West,Arya means Noble in the east. Rajeshfadnavis (talk) 07:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]