Talk:Y-Zet
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 6 June 2019. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Fights case
[edit]I've expand this article with reliable soures; WikiAviator what reason you revert reliable sources proved content? Check here [1]. Princess of Myadaung (talk) 11:20, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- I'am experienced IP editor without account; i have full knowledge in En wikipedia. I'll report you to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Princess of Myadaung (talk) 11:28, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- I fail to see the relevance of this.Slatersteven (talk) 12:07, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- Reasons of reverting stated in User:Princess of Myadaung's talk page. Also, the user personal-attacked me using short-formed foul language.WikiAviator (talk) 12:29, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- The edit is not relevent because this is just an unneccesary change of wording, which is not constructive. These uneccessary changes are disruptive. WikiAviator (talk) 12:29, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- It is where, provide the diff please.Slatersteven (talk) 12:41, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Asking "wtf" is a personal attack now? GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 12:30, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- It is where, provide the diff please.Slatersteven (talk) 12:31, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- I think this is the one in question? [2] GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 12:37, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- I think there was an edit conflict, I was replying to WikiAviator.Slatersteven (talk) 12:41, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- I think this is the one in question? [2] GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 12:37, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- It is where, provide the diff please.Slatersteven (talk) 12:31, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- the edit I see as nonconstructive is here:
Revision 900560435. See page history for the wtf and the talk page for both users for the user's insolent attacks.WikiAviator (talk) 01:55, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- You can't just link to it? El_C 01:56, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- I'll do it later cause I am using my mobile. The revision I am referring to is the revision before I first reverted by an IP user who now becomes registered.-WikiAviator (talk) 02:12, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- I don't see an issue with that edit summary — I think you are being oversensitive. El_C 02:33, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- I'll do it later cause I am using my mobile. The revision I am referring to is the revision before I first reverted by an IP user who now becomes registered.-WikiAviator (talk) 02:12, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- (Asking and replying to WikiAviator) Oh My God, Wait!! "Wtf" is personal attack? It is "interjection" How to personal attack???. Princess of Myadaung (talk) 02:29, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- But using foul language is inappropriate in Wikipedia. Also, according to your external link to the dictionary, it is used in social networks, but Wikipedia is NOT a social network. Also, changing a word that is not wrong is considered nonconstructive because you basically didn't improve anything!WikiAviator (talk) 03:00, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Expletives are permitted on Wikipedia, not to mention fuck, in this instance, was abbreviated. The rest of your comment makes no sense. What null edit? El_C 03:03, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- But using foul language is inappropriate in Wikipedia. Also, according to your external link to the dictionary, it is used in social networks, but Wikipedia is NOT a social network. Also, changing a word that is not wrong is considered nonconstructive because you basically didn't improve anything!WikiAviator (talk) 03:00, 7 June 2019 (UTC)