Talk:Yōguru-kun
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image copyright problem with Image:Yogurtkun.jpg
[edit]The image Image:Yogurtkun.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --10:24, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Deletion
[edit]It was stated that the only reason for deletion is because the content is not suitable for Wikipedia. This is clearly false; according to the deletion policy a page may be deleted for any of the following reasons (emphasis added):
- Copyright violations and other material violating Wikipedia's fair-use policy
- Vandalism, including inflammatory redirects, pages which exist only to disparage their subject, patent nonsense, or gibberish
- Advertising or other spam without relevant content (but not an article about an advertising-related subject)
- Content forks (unless a merge or redirect is appropriate)
- Articles which cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories and conclusions, and articles which are themselves hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes)
- Articles for which all attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed
- Articles whose subject fails to meet the relevant notability guideline (WP:N, WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC, WP:CORP and so forth)
- Articles which breach Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons
- Redundant or otherwise useless templates
- Categories representing overcategorization
- Images that are unused, obsolete, or violate fair-use policy
- Any other use of article, template, project, or user namespace that is contrary to the established separate policy for that namespace.
- Any other content not suitable for an encyclopedia
There is no content on this page. There are no sources or any clue as to where to look for sources. It is un-encyclopedic and not notable. It is for these reasons I'm am proposing a deletion, not an improvement to the article. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 07:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)