Talk:Xu Lai (actress)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Maile66 (talk · contribs) 14:13, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
Duplication Detector and Google Translate used. — Maile (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Lead, layout, formatting in compliance. No issues with prose. Not related to fiction. Not a list. — Maile (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
Every paragraph sourced at least once, more where necessary. — Maile (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Well balanced between acting career, personal life, and involvement in espionage activities. — Maile (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Zanhe has been the primary editor, with only minor edits by others. — Maile (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status:
All images are on Commons and appropriately licensed. — Maile (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Good use of images. — Maile (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Nice job on an interesting subject. — Maile (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]