Talk:Xserve

Apple Inc. High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Errors

The xserver clusternode has dual gigabit ethernet ports. A server shipping _without_ ethernet port would be pretty crazy, even for Apple.

Needed Section

It seems as if this article could use a section on "Criticism" or "Reception" of Macintosh's Xserve servers. 24.175.54.43 05:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---Agreed, says I! User: Coyotejack 21:04, 13 July 2006

Could someone mention the operating systems currently supported on this boxes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.247.147.124 (talk • contribs) 08:09, August 24, 2007

Name

Is the Xserve actually officially referred to as a "Macintosh" anywhere? Is there some official Wikipedia convention that makes it one regardless of that? I vaguely remember reading some years ago about about how Apple were trying to phase out the Macintosh name, or at least replace it with "Mac". --68.44.13.236 21:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting question... now that you mention it, I've never heard the term "Macintosh" or "Mac" used in reference to the XServe. Maury 23:24, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apple no longer sells a "Macintosh". everything is either MacSomething or just a name —Preceding unsigned comment added by Petchboo (talk • contribs) 20:48, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Link to UATA

The link to UATA, near "Up to 4 UATA/100 hard disk drives", leads to a page that does not contain UATA. --Mortense (talk) 08:21, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Intel Xserve image

The image being used under the Intel Xserve section is the same as the G5 Xserve, as I had noted when reading that the Intel one had a USB port on front instead of FireWire in the PowerPC models. Should the image be replaced? ChrstphrChvz (talk • contribs) 04:21, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be fine. Not all Intel Xserves have USB ports on the front. I have 2 at work that have firewire 400 ports and look identical to the G5 sitting above them. Skootles (talk) 02:16, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Xserve. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:25, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]