Talk:Xolo (company)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Xolo (company) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 January 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was Withdrawn.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in May 2015.

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as lacking sufficient context to identify its subject, because I have added more information. I am still adding more. Sorry for so many edits. yes, I know the information is still less, but at least you can change the tag. I have also invited many people (fanboys of XOLO) to edit this page. --PrajayXG (talk) 07:01, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --XOLOHQ (talk) 10:22, 22 January 2014 (UTC) Please do not delete it since relevant sources has been added and more sources will be added soon.[reply]

I've declined the speedy since there is just enough assertion of notability to pass the speedy deletion. The problem is that you still have to source the article with reliable sources to show that it passes WP:CORP as a whole. Things such as this review would be good. As far as inviting users to edit the page, that's great but please keep in mind that the page will have to be edited to be neutral. Not that there's anything wrong with a fan editing a page about something they like, just that in most cases they're predisposed to edit to make things more positive or if they're new users, edit in a fan tone without realizing it. Anything that comes across as a fan page or overly promotional will have to be removed or edited to be neutral in tone. On that note I'd also like to caution you that since we are neutral, if there is any negative coverage of the company, that can and should be included as well. We cannot have an article that is only positive unless the company is lucky enough to have received only positive coverage. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:03, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Please do not reinstate content that is not properly sourced. References such as <ref>according to employees edit</ref>, <ref>XOLO X-Series uses Intel Processors.</ref>, <ref>XOLO Q1000 Opus uses Broadcom chipset</ref>, and <ref>Most of the XOLO smartphones in the Q and A series except Q500 and A500 are MediaTek based.</ref> are not suitable and they can't be verified by other editors. Flat Out let's discuss it 01:57, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh really ? If you didn't remove the models' list.... PrajayXG (talk) 09:21, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The list of models is not a source, nor is it notable. Flat Out let's discuss it 09:38, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well... a list of models could be considered notable if the models have coverage in reliable sources such as reviews- which I've placed on the entry. See Apple_Inc.#Products for an example of what we can do with this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:11, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but an unsourced table of every model with detailed tech data is what was there when I made the edit. Flat Out let's discuss it 11:31, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Products section

The section on products needs to be either rewritten as prose or moved to a separate list. -- Rohini (talk) 11:13, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 0 external links on Xolo (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://urbanasian.com/bollywood/2013/09/ayushmann-khurrana-gets-cute-and-messy-with-xolo/,

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Xolo (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:12, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]