Talk:Xayacamach
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Xayacamach article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]This article is not nonsense, it has been a requested article for a while, I provided some sources (albeit very poor but it was all I could find on the internet while I have time to search a book). There is no good reason for deleting this article, it is important to the history of Mexico. --Solid Reign 02:06, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- I would like to second that it is notable, and that its notability is asserted. Smmurphy(Talk) 01:57, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Low-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- Stub-Class biography (military) articles
- Low-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- Stub-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- Stub-Class biography (royalty) articles
- Low-importance biography (royalty) articles
- Royalty work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class Poetry articles
- Low-importance Poetry articles
- WikiProject Poetry articles
- Stub-Class Indigenous peoples of the Americas articles
- Unknown-importance Indigenous peoples of the Americas articles
- Indigenous peoples of the Americas articles