Talk:XVI Corps (Union army)
This non-existent page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Additional Sources Needed
[edit]I just decided to do a reference tidy up and found that the entire page depends on one source only, the Civil War Archive page covering the Corps. This page does not appear to be a case of 'copy and paste', but is badly in need of additional sources both offline and online. Graham1973 (talk) 09:02, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on XVI Corps (Union Army). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131029184614/http://www.civilwararchive.com/CORPS/16thcorp.htm to http://www.civilwararchive.com/CORPS/16thcorp.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)