Jump to content

Talk:XM501 Non-Line-of-Sight Launch System

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How big is the whole package? Man-portable, vehicle-portable, ship-portable, fixed... Judging by the mention of the Littoral it's a naval missile system, but the article is somewhat unclear. -Toptomcat 18:26, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The first test vehicle was roughly 5 ft long, IIRC. The wings are so thin and tiny you don't think it would have flown. The fuselage fit standard 5-inch launch mounts. Too heavy for man-portable, I think, but it could have easily been carried on a modest vehicle. Aurora Flight Sciences launched the first one from their O-2 (Cessna 337).96.255.244.145 (talk) 04:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Lying with the LAMs

[edit]

Lockmart calls their baby the Loitering Attack Missile

http://www.lockheedmartin.com/products/NonLineOfSightLaunchSystem/

Shouldn't we use their term here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hcobb (talkcontribs) 07:37, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some speculation that the NLOS-LS is next to be canceled: its not official yet, but has been reported by industry sources: http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/04/23/nlos-ls-dies-just-cost-too-much/ as well as insidedefense.com, which is, unfortunately, a subscription site. Wasn't sure if I should include this info yet, since it doesn't seem to be official. Dpenn89 (talk) 03:38, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the timeline for the past four days. Hcobb (talk) 03:45, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No mention at all that the first bird was actually built and flown by Aurora Flight Sciences and Athena Technologies, at Wallops Island. Anybody have any official information on that? 96.255.244.145 (talk) 04:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on XM501 Non-Line-of-Sight Launch System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:44, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on XM501 Non-Line-of-Sight Launch System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:01, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on XM501 Non-Line-of-Sight Launch System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]