Talk:X: A Fabulous Child's Story

X: A Fabulous Child's Story has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 13, 2019. (Reviewed version).

A fact from X: A Fabulous Child's Story appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 February 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a short story about a child raised without a gender served as an inspiration for a 1975 scientific experiment?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2019/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/X: A Fabulous Child's Story.

Wikipedia

Children's literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:X: A Fabulous Child's Story/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Barkeep49 (talk · contribs) 01:17, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Review

The sources for the information in the first few sentences of Publication are unclear
In Reception I think Hurley is far more positive than you're characterizing them to be. The criticism is there but probably should reflect the balance of the source on the whole more.
In Legacy I think you need to lead with "some scholars of children's literature consider X: A Fabulous Child's Story to be part of the lineage of modern children's books with transgender themes, even though the story does not explicitly deal with trans gender identity." since that summarizes the paragraph. You can then present your three quotes/sources to contextualize it.

Discussion

Plan to start this in the next day or two. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:17, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bobamnertiopsis: This article is in excellent shape. See a few comments above. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:07, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Barkeep49: Good comments all! I've addressed each and look forward to additional feedback, if you have any. Thanks for the review! I hugely appreciate your work. Best —Collin^{t c} 02:34, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]