Talk:X-Men (film)/GA3

GA Review

Cast

• Unreferenced. I know plot can be unreferenced. Is this the same with cast sections?

Yes it is same with cast sections. Wildroot (talk) 01:13, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Development

• "Meanwhile, Avi Arad got the animated X-Men TV series produced by Fox Kids." The verb to get is a poor English verb, partly because it has so many meanings. Is there an alternative word or an alternative way of wording this sentence.

I'm sorry I don't get what you are trying to say Wildroot (talk) 01:13, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Nevermind, it has been passed. Wildroot (talk) 01:21, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Design and effects

• "She couldn't drink wine, use skin creams, or fly the day before, or her body chemistry would change just enough to cause all 110 prosthetics to fall off." This looks like a quote. Should it be?

It is not a quote Wildroot (talk) 01:13, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

• ""I had almost no contact with the rest of the cast; it was like I was making a different movie from everyone else. It was hell."" This is a quote yet isn't attributed to anyone. Who said it?

I thought the reader would obviously recognize it to be Romijn but I'll change it. Wildroot (talk) 01:13, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Music

• "Michael Kamen was eventually hired." Could do with a reference.

You don't need a reference for that because it's listed in the closing credits. That would be like needing a reference for Bryan Singer. Wildroot (talk) 01:13, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Reviews

• "with the consensus that the story "story [is] faithful to the comic books and, while the movie may be too Wolverine-centered, it packs a freaky punch that is sure to excite the average summer moviegoer"." Need to delete one use of story. I'll leave it up to you because I'm not sure if it should be the one in quotes or not.

Done Wildroot (talk) 01:13, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

A really good article. Well done. However, I'll leave it on hold, pending the points above. Peanut4 (talk) 21:21, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Passes all the criteria. Well done. Peanut4 (talk) 00:14, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Rouge Hurting Wolverine

How did Rouge hurt Wolverine? Shouldn't his healing have replaced whatever she took out? Also, why did his wounds reopen? Emperor001 (talk) 19:51, 12 September 2008 (UTC)