Talk:X-Men: The Last Stand/GA3
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 06:03, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
The article right now is in decent shape. Here is how it currently compares against the GA criteria:
- Is it well-written?: For the most part, yes. However, there are some MOS:QUOTEMARKS errors in the sections for "the brotherhood" and "critical response".
- Is it verifiable?: The character description for Cyclops, Multiple Man, Warren Worthington II, the U.S. President, and the last sentence in "Other characters" need citations. As for the sources themselves that are used, About.com (FN's 13, 45, and 112) and Starpulse (FN63) aren't reliable, and I'm not sure "mania.com" (FN8), "Teen Hollywood" (FN16), "CineSnob" (FN19), "Models.com" (FN22), "Ain't It Cool News" (FN's 30 and 49), "Dark Horizons" (FN31), "Hollywood Gothique" (FN48), "Fxguide" (FN55), "Superhero Hype" (FN's 62, 68, 74, 77, 79, 117, and 121), "salon.com" (FN87), "Screencrush" (FN95), or "Bleeding Cool" (FN96).
- Is it broad in coverage?: Even though they have referral links, the "music" and "video game" sections seem rather short. It would help to have detail on how well they performed commercially/critically as well as information on their content. One incomplete paragraph simply isn't enough for a section.
- Is it neutral?: Yes
- Is it stable?: Yes
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?: Yes
I am placing this on hold for seven days.
Expanded the two incomplete sections, replaced some refs (though Ain't It Cool News, fxguide, and Salon could get a pass). igordebraga ≠ 04:34, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- You've done well, though I should mention "Zap2It" (one source you added) is not at all reliable. There are still character descriptions missing citations. More refs need replacing, too (not talking about the ones you mentioned). The deadline is October 10th. Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:06, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- Replaced more. Models.com seems to have some credibility in its niche, Mania.com got a pass on the RS board, ScreenCrush, BleedingCool and SuperHeroHype all have editorial backing. See if anything else is necessary. igordebraga ≠ 02:45, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- The last thing needed was a citation for the sergeant, which I've added myself. Congrats, you got things done just in time, and I'm passing! Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:00, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Replaced more. Models.com seems to have some credibility in its niche, Mania.com got a pass on the RS board, ScreenCrush, BleedingCool and SuperHeroHype all have editorial backing. See if anything else is necessary. igordebraga ≠ 02:45, 10 October 2014 (UTC)