Talk:Wuest type herringbone gear

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 19 September 2017 by reviewer Drewmutt (talk · contribs).

Engineering

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Less wear? Really? Why? Better explanation needed...

Interesting concept, but why should it have better wear characteristics than a standard herringbone? Herringbone gears need to be used such that all but one of the gears in a meshed geartrain have end float on their shafts, so that the load on left and right sloping teeth are equal, and I don't see how you can do any better than that. Maybe if the tooth profile is not perfectly involute, the Wuest type will have any residual angular velocity errors at twice the frequency and half the amplitude of a standard herringbone, but there will be a residual alternating axial component too.

I feel that someone competent in the field needs to write a proper explanation before we can take it too seriously. Hopefully soon.

Tiger99 (talk) 21:57, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]