Talk:Wotton railway station (Brill Tramway)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 10:11, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- Will review. Pyrotec (talk) 10:11, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Overall summary
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
An interesting article on a now closed railway station and the line(s) to which it belonged.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- A good article (and now a GA) that could benefit from a simplification of the rather "dense" prose. What is there is technically correct, but it needs a concentrated focus in order to read it. (A high "fog" index?)
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Very well referenced.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Very well referenced.
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Well illustrated.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Well illustrated.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Despite making (uncomplementary) comments about your "dense" prose (and having watched Admin treating user with good faith, I'm tempted to let MF loose on this article) I'm awarding this article GA status. Congratulations on producing an interesting article on a closed Buckinghamshire railway station. Pyrotec (talk) 20:29, 15 June 2010 (UTC)