Talk:World energy resources
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
So, what exactly is a ZJ? What units is that graph at the top right supposed to represent? This article is incoherent to somebody who doesn't already know the information it will discuss.
In the nuclear fission section, the author claims to get this information: "The International Atomic Energy Agency estimates the remaining uranium resources to be equal to 2500 ZJ." from this source ' "Global Uranium Resources to Meet Projected Demand: Latest Edition of "Red Book" Predicts Consistent Supply Up to 2025". International Atomic Energy Agency. 2 June 2006. Retrieved 2007-02-01.', but the link only mentions uranium resources lasting 2500 years (not 2500 ZJ remaining). Was this just a typo, or does the full "Red Book" quote 2500 ZJ? Tprentice (talk) 21:24, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on World energy resources. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070131050300/http://www.opec.org/library/Annual%20Statistical%20Bulletin/pdf/ASB2005.pdf to http://www.opec.org/library/Annual%20Statistical%20Bulletin/pdf/ASB2005.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090708203819/http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/globalbp_uk_english/reports_and_publications/statistical_energy_review_2008/STAGING/local_assets/2009_downloads/statistical_review_of_world_energy_full_report_2009.xls to http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/globalbp_uk_english/reports_and_publications/statistical_energy_review_2008/STAGING/local_assets/2009_downloads/statistical_review_of_world_energy_full_report_2009.xls
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070128104118/http://ec.europa.eu/energy/energy_policy/doc/03_renewable_energy_roadmap_en.pdf to http://ec.europa.eu/energy/energy_policy/doc/03_renewable_energy_roadmap_en.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.eia.gov/international/reserves.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720021002/http://www.efda.org/fusion_energy/safety_and_the_environment.htm to http://www.efda.org/fusion_energy/safety_and_the_environment.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718181410/http://www.ren21.net/globalstatusreport/download/RE_GSR_2006_Update.pdf to http://www.ren21.net/globalstatusreport/download/RE_GSR_2006_Update.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722030340/http://iga.igg.cnr.it/documenti/IGA/Fridleifsson_et_al_IPCC_Geothermal_paper_2008.pdf to http://iga.igg.cnr.it/documenti/IGA/Fridleifsson_et_al_IPCC_Geothermal_paper_2008.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:41, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
ZJ
[edit]ZJ - what it is? No wikilink, no explanation. Is it Zeptojoule? Still not clear, some note with Zeptojoule to Barrel/Ton is highly required for this article. --Shufel (talk) 19:28, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Indeed, what is "ZJ"? Interesting article – but, after all these years, still damaged by an incomprehensible abbreviation! Nihil novi (talk) 09:49, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
All those abbreviations...
[edit]I've located (in Wiktionary) definitions for all those abbreviations in the article:
- GW = gigawatt = 10 to the 9th watts
- TW = terawatt = 10 to the 12th watts
- PW = petawatt = 10 to the 15th watts
- EJ = exajoule = 10 to the 18th joules
- ZJ = zettajoule = 10 to the 21st joules
- YJ = yottajoule = 10 to the 24th joules
Now, if someone could only put those in normal mathematical superscript-powers notations, and provide a table of the definitions for inclusion in the article...
Thanks.