Talk:Workplace wellness

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupational Safety and Health Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Health and fitness Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 January 2019 and 8 March 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rg2493.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2021 and 14 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jeslyndv. Peer reviewers: Cheynehoke.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 September 2021 and 7 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Zuyeda, JocelyneKiendra.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Long-time

Long-time reader, first-time contributor; go easy on me! The link which I removed (http://www.wellnessproposals.com) is to a commercial web site. Please note alternate sourcing for the first reference if KFF/HRET (both non-profits) are not considered proper sources. Theebs (talk) 18:49, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flawed CDC deaths from obesity estimation

I'm removing the chart and related text about obesity being second cause of preventable death. The CDC changed the number from 400,000 (July 2004) to 365,000 (January 2005) and then to 25,814 (April 2005). At least that's what the Washington Times reports, searching the CDC website produced a small FAQ, undated, which includes following text:

"Is CDC changing its estimate of obesity-related deaths?

Yes. We are no longer going to use the previous annual estimate of 365,000 deaths from poor nutrition and physical inactivity.

Instead, CDC will state, “The latest study based on a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults estimates that about 112,000 deaths are associated with obesity each year in the United States.” However, because the science continues to evolve and Americans’ health status continues to change, this estimate will very likely change in the future as more data become available and improved methods are developed."

Either way, the data in the article is flawed. Ssscienccce (talk) 18:33, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RAND study

Here's the Reuters report on the RAND study.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/24/us-wellness-idUSBRE94N0XX20130524 Exclusive: 'Workplace wellness' fails bottom line, waistlines - RAND By Sharon Begley NEW YORK | Fri May 24, 2013 6:39pm EDT (Reuters) - A long-awaited report on workplace wellness programs, which has still not been publicly released, delivers a blow to the increasingly popular efforts, Reuters has learned, casting doubt on a pillar of the Affordable Care Act and a favorite of the business community.

According to a report by researchers at the RAND Corp, programs that try to get employees to become healthier and reduce medical costs have only a modest effect. Those findings run contrary to claims by the mostly small firms that sell workplace wellness to companies ranging from corporate titans to mom-and-pop operations.

RAND delivered the congressionally mandated analysis to the U.S. Department of Labor and the Department of Health and Human Services last fall.

The report found, for instance, that people who participate in such programs lose an average of only one pound a year for three years.

In addition, participation "was not associated with significant reductions in total cholesterol level." And while there is some evidence that smoking-cessation programs work, they do so only "in the short term." ...

Another Reuters report: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/29/us-usa-healthcare-wellness-idUSBRE94S1ED20130529 --Nbauman (talk) 04:50, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And the actual RAND report:

http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR254.html#key-findings — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.205.197.247 (talk) 22:09, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Absurd program

The workplace wellness program is yet another absurd measure to improve the health of the American workers with more tricks, rather than granting them some time off. For some reason, these entries make look federally mandated vacation time a health risk to the employee, while statistics have proven the opposite again and again. More mandated vacation time will increase the health and productivity of workers, not genetic or even biometric screening. I also address this to conservative or religious communities, what will the worker do more, if he knows his grand-father was schizophrenic? Obesity? Well, clearly there the "genetic" component seems at least questionable.(Osterluzei (talk) 23:33, 22 March 2017 (UTC))[reply]

workplace wellness measures during the COVID-19 pandemic

I think this article should have a section detailing workplace wellness and its ineffectiveness during the COVID-19 crisis, especially as it relates to at-risk frontline healthcare workers such as myself. However, I haven’t added substantial information with cited sources to any articles yet, and I was hoping someone might know where to find sources and help me. Thanks! Lungespine (talk) 05:01, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Epidemiology of Occupations

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2024 and 18 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Supreetkhare007 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Supreetkhare007 (talk) 17:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA24 - Sect 200 - Thu

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 September 2024 and 13 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): DOSTPIDE (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by DOSTPIDE (talk) 19:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]