Talk:Workgroup (computer networking)

Microsoft Windows: Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Computing: Networking

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force.

What about "Workgroup" in reference to MS Windows Networking?

I feel that there should at least be a differentiation between "Workgroup" as in the Setting in windows versus "Workgroup" as in Peer to peer networking. Maybe a disambiguation page? While Yes, when you use workgroups in windows networking it is technically a serverless form of LAN peer to peer networking as compared to using the LAN "domain" setting in windows networking which needs a server, neither the article that workgroup redirects to (computer networking) nor the "Peer to Peer Networking" article talk about this at all. any thoughts? or am I just looking in the wrong place? PeteThornbury 06:08, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

workgroup

i am unable to access few workgroup computers but the same i can access my computer from athores pcs i workgroup —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.224.193.142 (talk) 11:54, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]