Talk:Workday Adaptive Planning
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 29 April 2024. The result of the discussion was merge. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Contested deletion
[edit]This page is not unambiguously promotional, because the material is well supported and documents a substantial company with a widely-used product. All statements have sufficient supporting evidence. Charlie Liang (talk) 00:20, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- Well other editors may have a different opinion, see below. W Nowicki (talk) 17:36, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Notability
[edit]All articles on Wikipedia must demonstrate the notability of the subject by references to reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The notability standard for companies is at Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies).
This article fails to demonstrate the notability of the company because half of the references are to adaptiveplanning.com itself and so not independent, and the other references do not give significant coverage, are not independent, or are not to reliable sources. The technologyreview page barely mentions AP; the intuitive-tek page is a blog and so is not a reliable source; the finance.yahoo page is an AP press release and so is not independent; the deloitte page does not give AP significant coverage; the information-management is not accessible but apparently does not give AP significant coverage. —teb728 t c 02:16, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Author not impartial.
[edit]This fact should have been disclosed by the author on the Talk page.
Author is or was a marketing employee of the company[1] Bartosik (talk) 13:32, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
References
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Adaptive Insights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141220003947/http://www.arc-consulting.cz/data/2013-03-31-12-27-59-Gartner-Customers-Rate-Their-CPM-Vendors.pdf to http://www.arc-consulting.cz/data/2013-03-31-12-27-59-Gartner-Customers-Rate-Their-CPM-Vendors.pdf
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-UnitedStates/Local%20Assets/Documents/TMT_us_tmt/TMT_us_tmt_Deloitte%202011%20Technology%20Fast%20500%E2%84%A2%20Rankings_102411.pdf,Deloitte,10/23/11 - Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.information-management.com/photo_gallery/1_12/10020001-1.html,Information
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:53, 4 October 2016 (UTC)