Talk:Work It (Missy Elliott song)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Ten weeks at #2!? The song(s) that kept it from #1 should also be specified.
Fair use rationale for Image:Missy elliott-work it.jpg
[edit]Image:Missy elliott-work it.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
evilzug
[edit]"For the animation Workit by "EvilZug", see Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger."
that should be taken out. it is the only mention of evilzug on the site, he's not mentioned on the work it page nor any other. Ill leave it up to someone more experienced than me. heatsketch, 17:42, August 12, 2007
Fair use rationale for Image:Missy elliott-work it.jpg
[edit]Image:Missy elliott-work it.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Requested move 7 January 2017
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
No consensus to move. bd2412 T 21:41, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
– Only 3 notable topics and this one receives 75% of traffic.[1] Unreal7 (talk) 19:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose; 75% is insufficient when there are other notable things by this name. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 04:06, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- Existence does not equate notability. I've said this many times. Unreal7 (talk) 11:08, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose, I don't think the MIssy Elliott song is overwhelmingly more significant than the Nelly and Justin Timberlake song. At least in the UK, their chart performances were similar. Dab page serves all readers better. — Amakuru (talk) 21:17, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Wiki Education assignment: HipHop Music Culture
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 February 2023 and 12 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): WLP3222 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Clariwyd (talk) 19:26, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Start-Class song articles
- Start-Class Hip hop articles
- High-importance Hip hop articles
- WikiProject Hip hop articles
- Start-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Low-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- Start-Class Women in hip hop music articles
- High-importance Women in hip hop music articles
- WikiProject Women in hip hop music articles
- Start-Class Women in music articles
- Mid-importance Women in music articles
- WikiProject Women in Music articles