Talk:Woolly hair
A fact from Woolly hair appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 July 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
"The presence of woolly hair may indicate other problems such as with the heart in Naxos–Carvajal syndrome" in the lede? I read further and it says that familial woolly hair may ... Is it true that "The presence of woolly hair may indicate other problems such as with the heart in Naxos–Carvajal syndrome" or is it just one of the factors and The presence of woolly hair doesnt indicate problems such as Naxos–Carvajal syndrome but people who have the syndrame frequently have familial woolly hair. I would prefer the latter warning but I havent read the sources so I'll leave it you, but we should not cause concern unless we are sure. Victuallers (talk) 17:17, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks.. not sure if I fully understand the question.. but if there is generalised woolly hair ... a cardiac assessment is required. It's in one of the sources, but will check. Whispyhistory (talk) 17:42, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 10:04, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- ... that woolly hair is difficult to brush? Source: "it is often impossible to brush the hair [wooly hair]...[1]
- ALT1 ... that black people don't have woolly hair?
- ALT2 ... that afro-hair is not the same as woolly hair?
- ALT3 ... that people with woolly hair may also have tooth decay?
- Reviewed: Kiyoe Yoshioka
- Comment: No hurry, still have to tidy a few parts
Converted from a redirect by Whispyhistory (talk) and Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Whispyhistory (talk) at 18:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC).
- Meets length and newness requirements, well sourced and the included citation is adequate for all options. Personally, ALT2 or ALT3 is preferred - ALT 2 is similar to ALT1 but I think it makes the point in an understandable way, ALT 3 is interesting. Thanks for submitting!JamieF (talk) 21:52, 5 July 2022 (UTC)