Talk:Wood glue

External Page Suggestions

I was wondering if it would be helpful to add some big brand wood glue examples in the "External Pages" section. I did a little research and saw that Elmer's Wood Glue and Gorilla Wood Glue were pretty well known and used as far as wood glues go. Noodle24 (talk) 10:53, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's fairly obvious that these are "wood glue", so I'm not sure what it would add to list them under "wood glue" in general. However I can see some value to listing them under specific wood glues, such as PVA, aliphatic resins and polyurethane. I'd also list Resin W (Evo-stik, plain PVA, predominant in the UK market) and Titebond. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:05, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Andy. Any chance you can add them to maybe the PVA page? Noodle24 (talk) 20:38, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

clamping

i saw it on discovery channel "Most wood glues need to be clamped while the glue dries.[citation needed]" citation: i saw it on "how its made" on discovery channel.. they had an segment about carousel designers..they used clamps when the wood blocs dried-- 213.52.36.106 (talk) 20:05, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PVA vs. aliphatic resin emulsion

What is the difference between ordinary PVA "white glue" and aliphatic resin emulsion "carpenter's glue" or "Yellow glue"?-96.237.78.13 (talk) 13:10, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help, Help, Help

I include information about the mechanical resistance of gluing, but I need help to:

a) put the reference in the proper format b) make a nice table with the data.

Thanks !!!!

Milton (talk) 02:51, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Wood glue. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge request

Requested that Aliphatic resin be merged to Wood glue on March 2019. Discuss below. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 00:11, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agree as proposer. The new article is a stub, though it has valid content and referencing; that's why it was not a Deletion Request. It would add to the all encompassing article here. Regards,
Oppose No rationale given for merging. Is "find a reason to either delete it or merge it into a trivial footnote in some huge existing article" to be our response to all new article creations? Andy Dingley (talk) 00:47, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. The general reader, however, shouldn't have to click through several links to stubs to find the information they're looking for. There is no need to have this information in two or more locations. Regards, GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 14:36, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I realize I am a little late to the game, but there are a few things dubious about this merger. One is that I (the original author of the article on aliphatic resin]] was never notified of it-- I realize that this step is considered "optional", but my guess is that it was not done so as to avoid having me made aware of the proposed merge and perhaps oppose it. Another is that the discussion does not appear to have a clear consensus to merge (one vote of support, by the proposed, and one oppose). The next issue is that the proposer then also performed the merge (which I don't think is supposed to happen in cases with no clear consensus to do so). I realize the discussion was open for some time, and that it did not attract much attention while open, but if there was no clear consensus to merge, shouldn't the proposal have been reviewed and performed by an uninvolved editor? I will grant that it was a short article, and I will grant that the article on wood glue might be a suitable place for it as a subtopic, but a merge as an alternative to deletion? What? For a bonafide notable subject? Why was deletion even considered? And if we take the example from WP:MERGE of articles on the non-notable parents of a notable celebrity being merged into the article on that celebrity, the case of aliphatic resin does not fit. Can this merge be reconsidered? A loose necktie (talk) 11:50, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Any merge can be undone, it's just a matter of doing the edit(s). I performed the merge because no one objected to merging what appeared to be a perma-stub, but feel free to undo if you feel it is appropriate. GenQuest ^"scribble" 06:51, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bio-based adhesives

The page currently lacks information on bio-based adhesives (bioadhesives), plant-based adhesives, protein-based adhesives, starch-based adhesives, etc. A restructuring of the page may also be needed. Any thoughts? --Dustfreeworld (talk) 09:33, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]