Talk:Women's International Boxing Association
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Women's International Boxing Association article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reason for POV-tag
[edit]This article is without neutral sources, and therefore should not contain people's "views" on the subject without telling who these people are. I may have used the wrong tag, if so I hope someone can replace it.
Some of the facts that are not "views" but are exact information, should probably also be referenced.
Unobjective characteristics include:
- a major force in the sport.
- considered by many within the sport as the best and most respected
- almost universally praised
- most of the WIBA champions are considered the legitimate best of their respective weight divisions.
- is seen by many within the sport as the crown jewel
- credited by some in the sport for having "raised the bar"
- having higher standards and ethics
--Tannkrem (talk) 09:58, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
[edit]I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
- There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
- It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
- In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:30, 5 July 2013 (UTC)