Talk:Wolaitta language

Ethiopia High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethiopia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ethiopia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EthiopiaWikipedia:WikiProject EthiopiaTemplate:WikiProject EthiopiaEthiopia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Languages

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Walamo

This page has been renamed in accordance with ISO 639-3 usage. The next edition of Ethnologue will follow ISO 639-3. (Taivo (talk) 07:18, 17 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Name of the language

I am not sure why this article uses the term "Walamo", instead of some form of Wolaytta/Welaita. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pete unseth (talk • contribs) 00:51, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Walamo is the name now used for this language in ISO 639-3. The next edition of Ethnologue will follow suit. (Taivo (talk) 03:56, 14 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Welamo is actually considered pejorative by the Welayta, the language should be renamed. — ዮም | (Yom) | Talk • contribs • Ethiopia 04:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you submit a change request to ISO 639-3 in that case. You will need documentation. (Taivo (talk) 05:18, 14 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

That is interesting. Following Taivo's link it appears that he is right. However, I just checked the list of the most recent changes to iso639-3, and no change from Wolaytta to Walamo is documented there. The request for such a change would have been made by SIL Ethiopia, and I'm quite positive that SIL Ethiopia did not make such a request (it would not make any sense). Maybe there is a mistake here. I will enquire about this to see what is going on. Landroving Linguist (talk) 19:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I enquired. The problem is that Wolaytta is one of the few Ethiopian languages with an own iso 639-2 code, and that always used Walamo as the language name. For sake of consistency, ISO 639-3 chose to just take over the 639-2 code. So the request needed to be made to the 639-2 authority (Library of Congress). I just filed this request. Once it is accepted, SIL will follow up by changing ISO 639-3. For now I guess we should stick to Wolaytta as the language name. Landroving Linguist (talk) 21:02, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess this is proof why Wikipedia should treat experts with more respect: don't argue about reliable sources with them because they can & will change the reliable sources. :) -- llywrch (talk) 18:45, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it was Winston Churchill who said "History will be kind on me, because I intend to write it." But, alas, you cannot control all the sources... Landroving Linguist (talk) 14:04, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Link

Should the link (currently not working) to [Maale language] be pointing to [Male language]? I'm not an expert on this corner of the world so I'm not touching it but it looks as if it might :) Akerbeltz (talk) 19:19, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are right! Landroving Linguist (talk) 17:06, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bible translation

There are two different dates given for the translation of the entire bible: 2002 and 2003. Which one is correct? --Jurgensen (talk) 14:15, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

done. Landroving Linguist (talk) 17:51, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Wolaytta language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:50, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wolaitta vs Wolaytta

Why is it called Wolaitta and not Wolaytta? Ethnologue, Glottolog, and ISO 639-3 all say Wolaytta, with y. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 07:22, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because Kwamikagami moved the page from Wolaytta to Wolaitta about 1 1/2 years ago. There is a discussion about it here. In principle, I agree with you, but note that there is a redirect, so people find the page when they look for Wolaytta. LandLing 15:25, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]