Jump to content

Talk:Wizarding World/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Slightlymad (talk · contribs) 05:14, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Brojam: I'll take over this one. Looks good at first glance but I should be finished for a few days.

  1. Well written
  2. Verifiable
  3. Broad in coverage
    • All major aspects: Green tickY
    • No unnecessary detail: Green tickY
  4. Neutral point of view
  5. Stable: Green tickY
  6. Images
  7. Pass/Fail: To be determined...

General comments

[edit]
That website copied the text from this article and Harry Potter (film series). It has Wikipedia as a source at the bottom. You can also still see the reference numbers from Wikipedia that they forgot to remove in the 'Future and Spin-off movies' part. - Brojam (talk) 21:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is there a reason why the first paragraphs in the Harry Potter films 1-4 are unsourced whilst 5-7 are?
The first paragraphs are premises/plots, so per WP:FILMPLOT a source is not required. When I was able to find a good source with the premise of the film, I included it, but I couldn't find any for the first four Harry Potter films. I could put reviews of the films that included plot summaries. - Brojam (talk) 21:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Changed ref. 36. The Leaky Cauldron has been used on multiple other Harry Potter GAs. - Brojam (talk) 21:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think 'Future' is a bad section header. Can you come up with an alternative?
What about 'Other sequels' or 'Undated sequels'? - Brojam (talk) 21:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Closing comment: There are no more problems with the article so I'm happy to say that I am now passing this GAN. It's a very nice, broad article that provides an overview of the Harry Potter franchise, which is helpful to those (myself included) who are overwhelmed visiting the HP-related articles individually. You might be interested in nominating it for WP:DYK as its a newly-promoted GA. Slightlymad 05:17, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! - Brojam (talk) 05:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]