Jump to content

Talk:Witold Pilecki/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Amitchell125 (talk · contribs) 18:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Happy to review the article

Comments

[edit]
Lead section / infobox

See MOS:LEAD for help in addressing the following comments:

  • I see no reason why there should be so many paragraphs. The article has less than 22,000 characters, which means the lead should be no more than three paragraphs long (MOS:LEADLENGTH)  Done
  • The lead section needs to be “a summary of its most important contents”, but it is not. For instance, nothing is included of Pilecki’s life before World War II;  Done
  • Much of the content in the last two paragraphs is excessively detailed for a lead section, and these paragraphs include “significant information... not covered in the remainder of the article”  Done
  • The information in the lead does not need to cited (except any quote you choose to keep in, see MOS:LEADCITE)
    • It does not but it can be, and this article has been a subject of some edit warring and other editorial disputes in the past. Hence the high density of citations in the lead (particularly relevant to the term volunteer, but some folks have also disputed other statements). I'll see if I can remove some redundant duplicate+ footnotes from it as I address your various points. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:42, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Understood. Amitchell125 (talk) 07:32, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are redundant citations (e.g. following In 1940 Pilecki volunteered and new communist authorities.) All the references can be moved to the main article (if they are not there already), as the information in the lead is not controversial

Also,

Happy for these links, but any links to modern Poland are misleading, considering the changes that have occurred during its history. AM
  • Link Warszawianka Company (Kompania NSZ „Warszawianka in the Polish Wikipedia) in the infobox, using {{Template:Ill}}
  • Done, and I've added that detail to the body (where it can be verified with the existing refs used there).
  • Polish Government-in-Exile – small e in exile  Done
  • Fighting Auschwitz: The Resistance Movement in the Concentration Camp should linked in its entirety Done
  • It might be worth placing the codenames in a separate note (see MOS:FIRST); Red XN


More comments to follow. Please indicate where you have addressed any issues using  Done. I will cross out comments I think are sorted, and add a small red cross (Red XN) if more needs to be done to address a comment. Amitchell125 (talk) 16:39, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Amitchell125: Lead part is mostly addressed, what do you think? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:42, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, it looks better. AM
1.1 Early life
  • Consider putting szlachta in italics and amending to {{lang|pl|szlachta}} to indicate it is a Polish word. Unless you tell me you don't want me to, I'll be bold and put similar 'lang' templates in as I meet them.
If the word is used in English, I think it can be left as it is. AM
  • had been deported to Russia – I would include that the family originated from Lithuania, according to Ref 7 (Cuber-Strutyńska)  Done
  • The Polish Wikipedia article (and Cuber-Strutyńska as well) gives more details about Pilecki's background and early years. Could these not be included?
See C-S pp. 282/283 (details of the estate he settled in during the 1920s); other useful sources used by the Polish Wikipedia seem to be self-published, e.g. this. AM
  • Amend ZHP to ‘Związek Harcerstwa Polskiego (ZHP)’  Done
I looked again and didn't see anything I found interesting, maybe the tidbit that the estate was "dowered by his great-grandmother"? But it seems trivial to me. Do let me know if you disagree or if I missed something else. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:11, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Happy to move on then. Amitchell125 (talk) 12:31, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
1.2 Polish–Soviet War
Understood, but I disagree. Where do you stop with providing links for younger readers? MOS:OL asks editors to consider whether "reading the article you're about to link to would help someone understand the article you are linking from". As World War I, covers every aspect of the war, every theatre, and every period, I would not send a reader to the article. Amitchell125 (talk) 12:34, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Errr, is your last sentence was intended? I do think that linking WWI helps a younger reader. Shall we call a WP:3O? I don't have strong feelings, but I'd rather keep the link if it's the same to you. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:13, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My typo. We can agree to keep it. Amitchell125 (talk) 12:37, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Probably not. AM
  • volunteer army should be in capitals  Done
  • defending the city of Grodno – as the city was not in Belarus (as it is today), perhaps it could be clarified that at the time it was a Polish city  Done as "then-Polish"
  • Consider adding this map to the subsection to help clarify the text.  Done but I am not sure it is for the best, we may have now some image-infobox text sandwiching, and is that map really particularly helpful? We also mention other cities, why the special treatment for that one? We could add map of the Polish-Soviet war, but again, that seems not super relevant IMHO, readers can visit articles about cities/wars to see more context and maps and such. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:46, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Understood. AM
1.3 Interwar years
see comment below. AM
  • I would move Pilecki was active in the local community, he was the chairman of a dairy and founded a farmer's association. He was also an amateur poet and painter. to a separate paragraph, as it is not related to his military activism during this period. - Right, but a) it would create a short paragraph and b) ECS mixes this info into other stuff, just we do. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:22, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I suspect he did a great deal for others. How about amending Pilecki was active in the local community, he was the chairman of a dairy and founded a farmer's association. to something like 'Pilecki actively supported the local farming community.' I'm not too concerned about the paragraph-splitting, it was a consideration. Amitchell125 (talk) 15:29, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Amitchell125 I am fine with shortening it like this, those details do seem mostly trivial.  Done Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
1.4.1 Polish September Campaign
Looks sorted now. AM
1.4.2 Resistance
It's fine. AM
'TAP' looks OK to me. AM
I would replace ...Pilecki saw that Włodarkiewicz was "flirting with anti-Semitic views" and had... with the more direct '...Pilecki saw that Włodarkiewicz's views had become more anti-semitic, and that he had...'. Amitchell125 (talk) 13:00, 13 February 2022 (UTC)  Done[reply]
1.4.3 Auschwitz
According to WP:IMAGESIZE "Except with very good reason, do not use px (e.g. |thumb|300px), which forces a fixed image width measured in pixels, disregarding the user's image size preference setting." Apologies if I've misunderstood this statement. Amitchell125 (talk) 14:34, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, interesting. I count 5 images outside the infobox which use px parameter, should be remove it from all and see what happens? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:43, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would amend the image in this subsection to upright=1.5. and not enlarge the others—when i checked, that seemed to work. Amitchell125 (talk) 11:58, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
By all means, do implement that code - I am not very familiar with it. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:39, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • , and, along with – the sentence needs to be split here, as it currently reads as if Pilecki's journey to the camp and arrival there are all part of the the second backstory
  • In autumn 1941 he was promoted to porucznik (first lieutenant) - it's perhaps not clear to readers how a man can be promoted when an inmate at Auschwitz.  In progress Hmm, the source doesn't clarify, but I think it's not that confusing. He was promoted outside the camp by his superiors, not sure when he learned about it but presumably that's the date on the documents. I am not sure how to clarify this in the absence of sources discussing this in more detail? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:55, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How about something like '..he learnt that "“far away in the outside world in Warsaw" he had been promoted to porucznik... ' (C-S p.288)? Amitchell125 (talk) 14:43, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't that language a bit unencyclopedic? But maybe I misunderstood something - would you mind tweaking the sentence first, and then I'll see how it looks? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:44, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done—the words in quotes are Pilecki's. Amitchell125 (talk) 12:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm assuming you're OK with my edit—please feel free to adjust it as needed. Amitchell125 (talk) 14:06, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Correct In autumn to 'In the autumn of’  In progress Grammarly insists that 'the' is wrong and added a comma... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:55, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Link back-stories (Backstory)  Done and removed the hyphen
  • Include the full Polish name of the ZOW where it is introduced  Done
  • to better inmate morale – ‘to improve the morale of the inmates’ sounds better  Done
  • from outside -’from outside the camp’  Done
  • For the sake of consistency, ZOW should be italics throughout  Done
  • kommandos – shouldn't this German term be in italics and with a capital letter?  In progress Italics, perhaps, capital, probably not, see also Kommando. I've added italics for now. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:55, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • While at Auschwitz is redundant -  Done changed to "As part of his duties," since I felt the paragraph needs some opening
  • I would add more details (using Cuber-Strutyńska, p295) to explain at the beginning of the subsection how Pilecki’s reports reached Home Army headquarters, (incorporating Further dispatches of Pilecki's were likewise smuggled out by individuals who managed to escape from Auschwitz.)  Done
  • a Home Army report on "The Terror and Lawlessness of the Occupiers - ‘a Home Army report, "The terror and lawlessness of the occupiers”’ (note the lack of capitals)  Done - but it's a translation anyway... should we add the title of the Polish original? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:55, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Errr, I would say keep it in correct English (or Polish or both). AM
  • was also broadcasting details – ‘was using a home-made radio transmitter to broadcast details’ improves the prose  Done
  • The secret radio station – The ‘transmitter’? This text begins an overlong sentence that should be split  Done
  • it was broadcasting – ‘it broadcasted’  Done
  • These reports were a principal source – it should be made clear whether These reports here were the ones smuggled out of the camp, or the ones that were broadcasted.  In progress I think the written ones were more important, also, the radio ones were written down, I doubt the radio in the camp had much range. However, the wording in the sources is not very precise when it comes to distinguishing them. See also Witold's Report, the terminology is inconsistent, as in - the reports were plural, obviously, but they are also lumped together into one "work" called a singular report... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:55, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How about amending These reports (specific) to something along the lines of 'The information provided by Pilecki' (non-specific)? Amitchell125 (talk) 14:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good.  Done Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:48, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already done? AM
  • Meanwhile – has little meaning here, as events are not being described in this paragraph  In progress I rearranged the paragraphs instead?
No it was redundant, apologies for not being clearer. Word now removed, please revert if I have altered the meaning. Amitchell125 (talk) 15:15, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Understood. AM
Understood. AM
See the second paragraph ("While in various slave labor kommandos and surviving pneumonia at Auschwitz, Pilecki organized an underground Military Organization). Amitchell125 (talk) 15:22, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've added the missing word Union. Not sure if this is what you were asking? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Now it makes sense. Amitchell125 (talk) 12:10, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

More to follow. it is starting to look as if the article needs quite a lot of work before it can be promoted. Amitchell125 (talk) 09:43, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1.4.4 Outside Auschwitz
  • Dupicate link - Home Army; ZOW (in coordinating ZOW)  Done during an earlier pass.
  • an initial report – I would omit initial, as it seems to contradict the idea that reports had already come out of Auschwitz  Done
  • focused – 'which focused'  Done
  • I would simplify rejected this proposal, since the camp's resistance was judged to lack sufficient strength to provide noticeable assistance during such an operation to ‘judged such an attack would fail’  Done
  • for rescued inmates – ‘for the rescued inmates’  Done
  • Unlink Soviet in Soviet Red Army  Done
  • Kedyw is in italics  Done As in, it should be in ialics, I assume.
  • Roman Jezierski is in italics? (as in the lead)  Done Changed to italics. Done
  • Later – if there is no date available, this should be omitted (MOS:RELTIME)  Done
  • providing what limited support he could to ZOW - ‘providing ZOW with what limited support he could’ sounds better IMO  Done
  • NIE should be introduced using the full term.  In progress This is not an acronym, as far as I can tell, this is the name of the organization. It means NO in Polish and unofficially it has been explained as a short from the Polish word for independence ("niepodległość") as well as affirmation of the rejection of communism. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:57, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Understood. AM
  • Comma after Polish resistance  Done
1.4.5 Warsaw Uprising
  • Dupicate links - Warsaw Uprising; Kedyw  Done earlier
  • city center – is the article written in British English (as in autumn, above), or in American English (as here)?  In progress I have no preference, but as an ESLer, I do tend to mix them occasionally. Whichever ones requires less rewriting is the one I'd chose :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:47, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I think BE requires less work, so I've added the template to the talk page and tweaked center. Amitchell125 (talk) 14:37, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • After the fall of the uprising – a date would be useful here  Done
  • He survived until liberation in 1945 at Oflag VII-A, in Murnau, Bavaria - seems in need of copy editing to improve the prose. Something like 'He was sent to Oflag VII-A, a prison-of-war camp for Polish officers located north of Murnau, Bavaria, where he remained until the prisoners were liberated in 1945.' And added a date for the camp liberation, with a ref.  Done
1.5 After the war
Expanding this is a good idea. Amitchell125 (talk) 14:43, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I expended the relevant content a bit. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:49, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • received death sentence - ‘received death sentences’  Done
2 Legacy
  • Duplicate link - Powązki Cemetery  Done during an earlier pass
  • The upper image shows very little of the monument and a lot of background, consider replacing it with something like this one  Done
  • Amend the fall of communism and Pilecki's rehabilitation to something like ‘the fall of communism in Poland and Pilecki's subsequent rehabilitation’  Done
  • From the 1990s, following the fall of communism and Pilecki's rehabilitation is redundant here  In progress Didn't you mean the repetition about the fall of communism following this sentence? (Which I removed) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:44, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. AM
You're correct. AM
I think you've done as much as you can, the picture will be clearer in future months, and can perhaps be updated then. Amitchell125 (talk) 14:46, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Final comments to follow. AM

References

@Piotrus: Whilst I'm checking the references, I'll be amending them (adding links etc.). As a reviewer, I know it's a good idea for me not to get too involved with editing, but tweaking the references won't alter the text of the article - I'll that side to you. Please revert/ping me if I've made an error in good faith. Amitchell125 (talk) 17:27, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Looking again at this section, there appear to be a number of different styles of formatting used throughout the article – see MOS:NOTES (“Editors may use any citation method they choose, but it should be consistent within an article.”) Amitchell125 (talk) 12:55, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Good point. My current preferred style is as seen in Witold_Pilecki#cite_note-:1-15 (Wysocki). One reference per book with {{rp}} used for page numbers in the article's body (the template is not needed for non-books as I think we don't cite specific pages for articles?). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your reply, I'm of course happy with any one style (yours included). Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 16:07, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Amitchell125 How is your reference cleanup? I noticed Wysocki reference still uses the rp template, while other books had their page ranges moved to the footnotes? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:26, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done by the end of this afternoon. AM
...and done. I've left a few 'page needed' tags in the article for you to pick up. Amitchell125 (talk) 15:15, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
* Ref 4 (Patricelli), do we have a page number for 4b? The text is being quoted. Amitchell125 (talk) 13:24, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Amitchell125 I believe this was added by User:Volunteer Marek, whom I'll ping - hopefully they have access to the source. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:27, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Do we have a page number for Ref 5 (Szumilo), or did you want to cite the whole chapter? Amitchell125 (talk) 13:37, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I would. AM  Done
3.1 Bibliography and further reading
  • Consider adding this link  Done
  • Consider separating the sources used for citations from the those considered to be for further reading  Done

On hold

[edit]
The lead section looks sorted, so I'll collapse it down. Amitchell125 (talk) 07:41, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Piotrus, now we've started, I'd like to keep going, but I don't want the process to be protracted. I can extend the GAN for another week until 21 February if you're able to continue addressing the issues. Amitchell125 (talk) 08:10, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
One section per day, I think we will make it by the deadline :) Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 19:44, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Passing now

[edit]

The article is looking fine, and is now easily at GA. Congratulations, passing now—many thanks for all your work. Amitchell125 (talk) 15:17, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]