Jump to content

Talk:Windows-1251

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Currently, the code point table looks like this.

Windows-1251
x0 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 xA xB xC xD xE xF
0x unused
1x
2x SP ! " # $ % & ' ( ) * + , - . /
3x 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 : ; < = > ?
4x @ A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O
5x P Q R S T U V W X Y Z [ \ ] ^ _
6x ` a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o
7x p q r s t u v w x y z { | } ~
8x Ђ Ѓ ѓ Љ Њ Ќ Ћ Џ
9x ђ   љ њ ќ ћ џ
Ax NBSP Ў ў Ј ¤ Ґ ¦ § Ё © Є « ¬ SHY ® Ї
Bx ° ± І і ґ µ · ё є » ј Ѕ ѕ ї
Cx А Б В Г Д Е Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П
Dx Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Ъ Ы Ь Э Ю Я
Ex а б в г д е ж з и й к л м н о п
Fx р с т у ф х ц ч ш щ ъ ы ь э ю я

Comparing it to Microsoft's Windows 1251 reference website, which I would call authoritative, I guess it's wrong: the code points from 0x00 to 0x1F are filled with C0 control codes, 0x7F is the DEL character. --Abdull 11:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Obsolete" is POV

[edit]

If you go looking for online material in Russian etc., you will probably find a lot more in CP-1251 than in Unicode. Unicode certainly is the "wave of the future", however calling 1251 "obsolete" seems premature. LADave (talk) 16:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is it Code Page 1251 or not?

[edit]

I am very puzzled by this statement: "The following table shows Windows-1251. Each character is shown with its decimal code and its Unicode equivalent. (Codepage given below is Latin-Cyrillic, not Windows 1251)." Either it is 1251 or it isn't. No? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.106.220.83 (talk) 14:56, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is. Fixed, thanks. --5ko (talk) 08:27, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]