Talk:Windows-1251

Currently, the code point table looks like this.

Windows-1251
	x0	x1	x2	x3	x4	x5	x6	x7	x8	x9	xA	xB	xC	xD	xE	xF
0x	unused
1x	unused
2x	SP	!	"	#	$	%	&	'	(	)	*	+	,	-	.	/
3x	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	:	;	<	=	>	?
4x	@	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L	M	N	O
5x	P	Q	R	S	T	U	V	W	X	Y	Z	[	\	]	^	_
6x	`	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h	i	j	k	l	m	n	o
7x	p	q	r	s	t	u	v	w	x	y	z	{	\|	}	~
8x	Ђ	Ѓ	‚	ѓ	„	…	†	‡	€	‰	Љ	‹	Њ	Ќ	Ћ	Џ
9x	ђ	‘	’	“	”	•	–	—		™	љ	›	њ	ќ	ћ	џ
Ax	NBSP	Ў	ў	Ј	¤	Ґ	¦	§	Ё	©	Є	«	¬	SHY	®	Ї
Bx	°	±	І	і	ґ	µ	¶	·	ё	№	є	»	ј	Ѕ	ѕ	ї
Cx	А	Б	В	Г	Д	Е	Ж	З	И	Й	К	Л	М	Н	О	П
Dx	Р	С	Т	У	Ф	Х	Ц	Ч	Ш	Щ	Ъ	Ы	Ь	Э	Ю	Я
Ex	а	б	в	г	д	е	ж	з	и	й	к	л	м	н	о	п
Fx	р	с	т	у	ф	х	ц	ч	ш	щ	ъ	ы	ь	э	ю	я

Comparing it to Microsoft's Windows 1251 reference website, which I would call authoritative, I guess it's wrong: the code points from 0x00 to 0x1F are filled with C0 control codes, 0x7F is the DEL character. --Abdull 11:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Obsolete" is POV

If you go looking for online material in Russian etc., you will probably find a lot more in CP-1251 than in Unicode. Unicode certainly is the "wave of the future", however calling 1251 "obsolete" seems premature. LADave (talk) 16:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is it Code Page 1251 or not?

I am very puzzled by this statement: "The following table shows Windows-1251. Each character is shown with its decimal code and its Unicode equivalent. (Codepage given below is Latin-Cyrillic, not Windows 1251)." Either it is 1251 or it isn't. No? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.106.220.83 (talk) 14:56, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is. Fixed, thanks. --5ko (talk) 08:27, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]