Talk:Windmill at Wijk bij Duurstede

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Windmill at Wijk bij Duurstede article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Mills Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mills, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mills on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MillsWikipedia:WikiProject MillsTemplate:WikiProject MillsMills articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Duplication

Hmm .. seems to be a problem with detecting duplication. I created this page Draft:Windmill_at_Wijk_bij_Duurstede on Sep 6. Oh well. I shall move my stuff over to here. Edwininlondon (talk) 14:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Title

The title Windmill of Wijk bij Duurstede is used in the article text, but the article title is Windmill at Wijk bij Duurstede. What title is generally used for this painting? – Editør (talk) 09:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure - it depends whether this was the only windmill there at the time. If so, then "of", if not, then "at". I think either is fine. Jane (talk) 09:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]