Jump to content

Talk:Wind power in South Australia/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
More than one section was tagged months ago as needing update. If someone is willing to update please let me know and I will then check for and list anything else needed to keep it good.Chidgk1 (talk) 08:04, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend delisting. It has been eight days since the review started with no improvement. Parts of the article are really repetitive, for example:

  • Construction of Stage 1 began in September 2015 and was finished in September 2017. Stage 1 consists of 32 turbines each having a rated capacity of 3.2 MW (total 102.4 MW). Construction of Stage 2 began in July 2016 and was finished in June 2017. Stage 2 consists of 32 turbines each having a rated capacity of 3.2 MW (total 102.4 MW). Construction of Stage 3 began in April 2017 and was finished in December 2017. Stage 3 consists of 35 turbines each having a rated capacity of 3.2 MW (total 112 MW).

The article also has a questionable overlap with List of wind farms in South Australia and the Operational wind farms section feels more like a list than an article. The short sections do not make for good readability. Finally, when I see the 2011 Renewable Energy Plan section, I wonder if there have been any other or more recent plans relating to wind energy. Steelkamp (talk) 16:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delisting as no longer meets GA criteria 3a to be broad in its coverage and address the main aspects of the topic Chidgk1 (talk) 13:44, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.