Talk:Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Society

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiltshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiltshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wiltshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WiltshireWikipedia:WikiProject WiltshireTemplate:WikiProject WiltshireWiltshire
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger discussion

Proposing merging Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Magazine into this article. The magazine is the dedicated journal of the society and it makes sense to deal with the two together.Tacyarg (talk) 12:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Both are notable and will need a lot of space when decent articles develop. See, for instance, Wiltshire Record Society, which is a spin-off from both. Moonraker (talk) 22:30, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The magazine article is a stub, and the society article is a very short start. The topic is a narrow, local one, and it's unlikely that either article will be expanded substantially any time soon. From the reader's point of view, there seems nothing to lose and everything to gain from merging. Compare e.g. Somerset Archaeological and Natural History Society, Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire, London and Middlesex Archaeological Society, Surrey Archaeological Society and many others, none of which have separate articles for their journals. If and when the articles grow to a substantial length, they can be split again (compare Cambrian Archaeological Association and Archaeologia Cambrensis – I can't immediately see any other examples for county societies). Wiltshire Record Society is a quite different case: although it has its roots in the archaeological society, it's now a completely separate body, and its article is substantial. GrindtXX (talk) 11:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's not much more than an argument from authority, GrindtXX, not to mention the predictions plucked out of the air. Moonraker (talk) 05:25, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[[[reply]

Withdrawing proposal - given the length of Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Magazine now Moonraker has enlarged it, I think I need to withdraw the merge proposal. Thanks to both of you for your views. Tacyarg (talk)