Talk:William de Clinton, 1st Earl of Huntingdon

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Peerage and Baronetage / Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Unreferenced articles

This article was provided with references by an Unreferenced articles project volunteer on 2008-08-05. If you edit this page, please build on the good work by citing your sources.Unreferenced articlesWikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articlesTemplate:WikiProject Unreferenced articlesUnreferenced articles articles

Bartholomew

The Patent Rolls PR Edward III 1327 give the actual naming used at the time by King Edward III "Bartholomew de Burgherssh', constable of Dover Castle and warden of the Cinque Ports". He was not called "Lord Burgherssh" If you have another Citation that conflicts, please post it. Wjhonson 17:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An English paraphrase of the original Latin does not precisely strike me as definitive. Choess 06:21, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's one more source than the other editor uses, who doesn't use any. Just tries to bully people into accepting his uncited opinion. And the Patent Rolls are considered definitive for this time period, they are a primary source. Wjhonson 14:58, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]