Talk:William T. Powers (industrialist)

Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Michigan Low‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On notability

William T Powers is one of the early founders in the region, and on that fact along, it's notable his contributions to the early settlers of the region, in the sense of locating towns/industry, establishing/involvement in early government and establishing an economic base for later generations. Think: early entrepreneur/notable citizen (he was active in certain forms of government (including Mayor), although not specifically directly political) Godfollower4ever (talk) 00:19, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On sourcing/verifiability/neutrality: The article is extensively sourced with non-modern sources. This, in my mind, is not an issue in regard to the creditability of the sources. And these are all verifiable as historical sources. Just because these sources are not in electronic form, nor in a modern form of articulation, doesn't mean they are not authoritative, inaccurate or non-neutral. In the mid to late 1800’s this use of language was not considered self-promotion/non-neutral, but an historical narrative of events. This has since changed, but it doesn’t call into question any factual, verifiable or neutrality issues. Godfollower4ever (talk) 00:32, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On removal of notability/sourcing/verifiablilty/neutrality warning: For the above stated reasons, I've removed the warning. The article may need updating from the older form of language into our modern venacular, and a more modern form of citing references, but it should not be deleted, removed in whole or various parts of the content removed. Just edited/updated. Godfollower4ever (talk) 00:42, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a major user of non-internet 19th-century sources myself; but until and unless the non-neutral language is removed, the notability more clearly established, and the borrowed language turned into actual specific footnotes sourcing the actual facts, the maintenance templates need to remain. Address the problem, THEN remove the tags. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:28, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May I also make a suggestion, several of the pre-1923 sources are available on-line. It would be a good idea to add inline citations to the article from these on-line sources. For example, the 1891 book, History of the City of Grand Rapids is available at Google Books here. If you need any help, ask away on my talk page. Bgwhite (talk) 06:15, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 7 May 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. wbm1058 (talk) 12:05, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

William T. Powers (Michigan) → William T. Powers (industrialist) – Better disambiguator. I am open to other possibilities, which is why I did not just do a "speedy" move. However, "Michigan" seems like a poor choice. —BarrelProof (talk) 17:17, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support: seems a much better disambiguator. Insert CleverPhrase Here 09:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.