Talk:William Swann
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the William Swann article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]I included myself as an American Psycholgist because I believe that my record warrants it. For example, in a 1995 poll, I was ranked 35th of the 50 most cited psychologists in the world. In a 1999 poll, I was ranked 22nd most cited researcher in the Annual Review of Psychology. In a 2002 survey, i was included in list of most cited contributors to the major Handbooks of Social Psychology. In a 2004 survey of authors published in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, I was among the 30 most cited. In a 2006 survey in Dialogue, I was among the top 30 of most cited authors in Social Psychology textbooks. My current citation count is over 5,000. Wbswann 22:04, 11 January 2007 (UTC)wbswann
Notability of William Swann
[edit]Having spent a long time searching for sources for this article, I've come to the conclusion that, 1) Swann comfortably meets Criterion 1 of WP:ACADEMIC. His research attracts very many citations, and is a staple of many textbooks in social psychology. 2) While there are lots of sources about his research contributions such as self-verification, there is a distinct lack of biographical information about him. I conclude that the article belongs here, but for now the biographical information needs to come from his own site and CV. Hopefully in the long run there will be third-party biographical sources. MartinPoulter (talk) 10:03, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class psychology articles
- Mid-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles