Talk:William Magee (Medal of Honor)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the William Magee (Medal of Honor) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Biography / North America / United States / American Civil War Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Civil War / Military history Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	American Civil War portal This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - American Civil War task force.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.

Alleged Fraud--citations needed

Apparently there has been a book about this but it is not cited here. The description of him holding back a Confederate charge and saving a Union camp are the not the actions described in his official Medal of Honor citation which explicitly states that it happened during a charge and not a defensive action. It is unclear if the actions are the same event, different events and if both are allegedly fraudulent or just one. The use of scare quotes in the last sentence further confuses the issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moerster (talk • contribs) 18:19, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations that the medal of honor was fraudulently obtained - citations

The book review at https://muse.jhu.edu/article/262520/pdf , of the book

Drummer Boy Willie McGee, Civil War Hero and Fraud. By Thomas Fox. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland, 2008. ISBN 978-0-7864-3289-9. Photographs. Appendixes. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Pp. 288. $35.00.

claims that the fraud in question is well known to historians and "In a brief 227 pages of text Fox tells the story of William McGee, perhaps the ultimate charlatan of, and in, American military history. As the author himself notes, a fictional account of the kinds of scams McGee pulled off would be criticized as implausible overreach on the part of the writer. Not even the most twisted creatures of a Dickens novel had the audacity to try most of what McGee actually pulled off in real life. But Fox nails down the truth."

A quote of this review article would seem dutiful as a stopgap acknowledgement of at last the existence of critical opinions; without such an acknowledgement this wikipedia entry risks being subtly deceptive: it does not claim that the official record is correct, but fails to acknowedge evidence that it is especially open to doubt. For the long run, it seems that the aspiration must be that this page should cite whatever consensus there is among historians on this topic, or if there is still disagreement, what are teh versions of history being debated. Attentive21 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 14:53, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]