Talk:William Henry Sleeman

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the William Henry Sleeman article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Law Enforcement

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

India

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

British Empire

	British Empire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This article should be put under geniuses. For William Sleeman was a genius--212.219.59.228 (talk) 10:25, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Report in 1889

I doubt that he had a report made, having died 33 years earlier. I changed that to 1839. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.199.131.148 (talk) 17:05, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on William Henry Sleeman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150204231210/http://www.dinodata.org/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=7639 to http://www.dinodata.org/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=7639

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Slurs

QUOTE: Unlike the vast majority of British officers, he was never known to have used slurs like "niggers" or "blacks" to describe his Indian household servants or sepoy soldiers. END OF QUOTE.

This is a very bad piece of writing. English officials (do not know about the Celtic speakers) who lived in the Subcontinent did not use bad words to their serving persons. In fact, it was the native landlords and their henchmen who used words like Nee, Thoo, Eda, Edi, Enthada, Enthadi, Avattkal, Chekkan, Cherumann, Pennu, Avan, Aval &c. to their serving persons. People who have first hand information on how the Englishmen related to the local populations, know that most persons who served them improved much in the local society. However, this was a very bad experience for the local social higher ups and their henchmen who took up the argument that it was the Englishmen who were using bad words to their serving classes.

However, it might be true that the Englishmen might have used word inserted in the article by some clown to these clowns and their ancestors.

Sleeman and Jim Corbett

In Tarun Kumar Bhaduri's book 'Behor, baaghi, banduk', about the dacoits of the Chambal region, there is a story about Sleeman and Corbett working together to capture the 'baaghi' Sultana. As far as I remember, this was also mentioned in Jim Corbett's autobiography 163.116.199.119 (talk) 08:47, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]