Talk:William FitzOsbern, 1st Earl of Hereford

Military history: Biography / British / European / Medieval Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Biography: Military / Peerage and Baronetage

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage (assessed as Low-importance).

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Herefordshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Herefordshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Herefordshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HerefordshireWikipedia:WikiProject HerefordshireTemplate:WikiProject HerefordshireHerefordshire
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

MonmouthpediA Mid‑importance

	This article is related to MonmouthpediA and to Monmouth – the World's first Wikipedia town. As of May 2012, we have 1,000 QRpedia codes displayed in the town. See what we are doing, See a bit of what we've done and help us!MonmouthpediAWikipedia:GLAM/MONTemplate:WikiProject MonmouthpediAMonmouthpediA-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Mid‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name?

Wasn't it Fitz Osbern, with a space? I am learning this at school and am sure it had a space... LucarioAuraSphere (talk) 11:37, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Guys, guys.... Mediaeval spelling varied a lot. You could probably find Fitz Osbern, Fitz Osborn, fitzOsbern, fitz Osbern, and all manner of permutations. The spelling "fitz Osbern", with or without a space, was perfectly normal - it was not what we now call a "surname", it simply said that he was the son ("fitz" in Norman French) of Osbern. Capitalising it and running it together as "FitzOsbern" is simply a modern variant that more closely accords with how we now spell surnames. If this tedious edit war is to continue, can it please be based on the preponderance of view in reliable sources (I have no idea what it is, and don't care), rather than on someone's misguided idea of what is "correct". Ghmyrtle (talk) 20:37, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Very sensible observation, if I may say so. I'd suggest that the modern variant spelling is the appropriate one to use. A diverse range of mediaeval throwback usages is merely distracting, even if such spelling would have been recognised by medieval readers as correct (or, more likely, as being among a number of acceptable usages). Regards Ironman1104 (talk) 10:38, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming?

Under the Marriage & progeny section, it says:

Secondly it must be assumed that he also married Richilde, Countess of Mons and Hainaut shortly before the Battle of Cassel in 1071.

Why must it be assumed, & what is the source for the assumption? ScarletRibbons (talk) 20:28, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Surname of Crepon

I'll first admit that my surname is Crepon, one of very few left on this Earth today descended of this man and his kin. However, I'd like to ask if William FitzOsbern may be at least secondarily written in the text as William FitzOsbern Crepon to signify he was of the Family Crepon. Thank you. I believe I've tried just changing it in the past- but it was reverted. 2601:19A:4400:1A02:893C:48F8:1B77:305A (talk) 17:04, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You would need to identify already published reliable sources, independent of the family, that use the name William FitzOsbern Crepon. We cannot rely on original research. Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:06, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reference for a Godfrey de Crepon Candie being son of William. Godfrey is not mentioned on the page of his purported mother Richilde. Ian Hampson - October 2023 2A00:23C8:3B02:4E01:551D:1028:62B4:170C (talk) 08:40, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]