This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
David spoke very compellingly to the effect that Pitzer was left-handed. He said that he and friends would tease Pitzer about being a 'southpaw,' and think it was funny when Pitzer would deal cards counterclockwise, due to being left-handed. These comments by David are made in "The Men Who Killed Kennedy." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.197.34.74 (talk) 03:23, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Like much connected to the Kennedy Assasination this is a junk article. The listing of Vincent Bugliosi as a source for Bitzer being connected to the assassination is an example of under using sources, poor sourcing, and not being honest about the matter. Bugliosi's number 1 argument is that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, in no way shared with anyone before hand enough information to suggest that anyone else knew he was going to assassinate the president, and all theories of some sort of conspiracy are false. The fact that the reference to Bugliosi's book does not provide a page number is a red flag of poor refernecing. Bugliosi does not support the theories that lead to notability for this subject, and if we are going to use him as a source we need to represent what he actually said.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
