Jump to content

Talk:Willi Rosenstein

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Concern" tags

[edit]

I have added subject's Iron Cross award to prove notability. I have also added an "underconstruction" tag, as stub was tagged just 33 minutes after it was begun. As the creator of some hundreds of articles in this section, I suppose I can pass myself off as an expert in this niche. I will backstop the present author, and re-edit the article after he is done, if it needs it.

Georgejdorner (talk) 21:52, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The following contain data for this article:

Fokker D VII aces of World War 1, Norman L. R. Franks Authors Norman Franks, Greg VanWyngarden Illustrated by Harry Dempsey Edition illustrated Publisher Osprey Publishing, 2004 ISBN 1841767298, 9781841767291 (There is also a 2005 edition of this, but I don't know if it covers Rosenstein.)

  • Pfalz Scout Aces of World War 1

Volume 71 of Osprey aircraft of the aces ; 71 Author Greg VanWyngarden Edition illustrated Publisher Osprey Publishing, 2006 ISBN 1841769983, 9781841769981

  • Albatros Aces of World War 1

Volume 32 of Aircraft of the Aces, 32 Volume 32 of Osprey Aviation Series Volume 32 of Osprey aircraft of the aces Part 1 of Albatros aces of World War I, Norman L. R. Franks Author Norman L. R. Franks Edition illustrated Publisher Osprey Publishing, 2000 ISBN 1855329603, 9781855329607 (Maybe a little info here.)

  • Albatros Aces of World War 1

Volume 77 of Aircraft of the Aces Series Part 2 of Albatros aces of World War I, Norman L. R. Franks Author Greg VanWyngarden Edition illustrated Publisher Osprey Publishing, 2007 ISBN 1846031796, 9781846031793 (Photo and caption.)

Hope this helps.

Georgejdorner (talk) 04:23, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confused by wording

[edit]

The lede says the subject was a "flying ace in World War I, credited with 9 victories" but the article later says "The war ended without Rosenstein scoring a ninth victory or receiving the Hohenzollern.". Am I missing something or is this a mistake?