Talk:Willersley Castle

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Derbyshire Low‑importance

The article on Willersley Castle is supported by the Derbyshire WikiProject, which is a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of Derbyshire-related articles on Wikipedia.DerbyshireWikipedia:WikiProject DerbyshireTemplate:WikiProject DerbyshireDerbyshire

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	At least one photograph is included in this article
	This article needs a map

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Climbing route

Why was the link including photographic evidence not a valid source? Tannim101 (talk) 11:20, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Two reasons: 1) the source quoted was a user-generated thread on a climbing forum, which fails Wikipedia's rules on reliable sourcing (see WP:USERGENERATED) and 2) the statement that the routes had been "destroyed" was very much a matter of opinion (there's even dissenting opinion within that forum thread, suggesting that the changes could be largely undone). I know nothing about climbing so I have no idea of the rights or wrongs of the case, but my reversion of your change was purely on editorial/policy grounds. Dave.Dunford (talk) 09:40, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]