Jump to content

Talk:Will Venable/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I'll get some comments up shortly. Apterygial talkstalkinsane idea 02:35, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

Overall it looks pretty solid. Some minor points though:

Apart from that (and it is a lot less than it looks) the article is good. I'll put it on hold and allow these problems to be adressed, and then I'll be happy to pass the article. Apterygial talkstalkinsane idea 03:35, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me.

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Good read, well written, well referenced. It's pretty clear you know what you are doing here! Apterygial talkstalkinsane idea 06:55, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]