Jump to content

Talk:Wilfred De'Ath

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contested deletion

[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because

Please see links - he is a renowned author and TV produced - quite apart from teh recent scandals!

He also comes from an important family - see Charles and Rob.

However, I agree he needs more work!

Jb1944 (talk) 17:56, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --Jb1944 (talk) 17:57, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Barney the barney barney (talk) 20:11, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

John Lennon citation

[edit]

The John Lennon source was in the copy when I visited it. I didn't have access to the source, but I was able to clean up the citation. Still could someone with access to the book, double check this and further fill in the cite (such as page)? One doesn't know from the original citation if the interview was included in full or part or if the interview was mentioned in the book. I waver over whether or not to slap a "dubious" template on it as its not immediately verifiable and it is incorrectly cited in its present form.Crtew (talk) 13:37, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

More work needed

[edit]

The article is currently in AfD. If it survives, someone with interest should fill in additional details, like he was a film reviewer and wrote a column in a local newspaper (subject of libel suit). Once could also create an infobox pretty easily including such details as his family along with his professional work.Crtew (talk) 13:37, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alias

[edit]

In the hotels article, he mentions that he used several aliases while swindling. The infobox as a place for aliases but I'm unsure about whether or not that would be included. I'll leave that decision for someone else.Crtew (talk) 13:37, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

De'ath / De'Ath inconsistency

[edit]

There is no consistency between the two forms of capitalisation in the article. 83.104.249.240 (talk) 21:17, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]