This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
i dont think you should just say it reads like an advert, you have to qualify your opinion and not just slap a big silly sticker on a page. i found it very informative and to the point and didnt get the impression it was an advert, although it may indeed be copied from the back of book, you should check whether something like that is in fact the case, before you make statements about it. citation required, as they say in wikipediaspeak. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cleobolus (talk • contribs) 20:08, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, the "advertisement" tag was a valid criticism, and you don't need to "qualify" it. It did read like an advertisement, thought it's since been improved. - Jason A. Quest (talk) 14:29, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
