Talk:Who We Are and How We Got Here/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jaldous1 (talk · contribs) 19:14, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Many thanks for taking this on. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:23, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written. I performed a grammar check and copy-edited a few areas.--Jaldous1 (talk) 19:48, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- It is factually accurate and verifiable. Good use of notable and verifiable sources.--Jaldous1 (talk) 22:01, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage. It passes this requirement. --Jaldous1 (talk) 19:49, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy. It passees this requirement. The book is controversial and the article covers both sides well. --Jaldous1 (talk) 19:49, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable. There was one issue raised which article author addressed.--Jaldous1 (talk) 22:01, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate. Yes. --Jaldous1 (talk) 22:01, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass:
- Pass: