Talk:Whitechapel murders/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ✽ Juniper§ Liege ^(TALK) 06:03, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be undertaking the review of this article against the Good Article criteria, per its nomination for Good Article status. ✽ Juniper§ Liege ^(TALK) 06:03, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Quick fail criteria assessment

1. The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.

   • 

2. The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.

   • 

3. There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.

   • 

4. The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.

   • 

5. The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.

   • 

Article passes quick-fail assessment. Main review to follow. ✽ Juniper§ Liege ^(TALK) 06:05, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Wow, ok, very sobering read!!!!!

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):

   • Well written. Established and maintains a succint and factual tone necessary for such subject matter.

   b (MoS):

   • Conforms to manual of style. Little bit of overlinking; names should only be linked once in an article.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):

   • Well referenced.

   b (citations to reliable sources):

   • Citations are to third party publications. Good variety of sources.

   c (OR):

   • No evidence of OR. Presents established knowledge only.

3. It is broad in its scope.

   a (major aspects):

   • Addresses major aspect of article subject matter. Keeps to the murders.

   b (focused):

   • Remains focused. No digressions.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy:

   • No issues concerning POV evident.

5. It is stable:

   • No edit wars etc.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

   • Images are properly tagged and justified.

   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   • Images are accompanied by contextual captions.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: PASS ✽ Juniper§ Liege ^(TALK) 06:44, 2 April 2010 (UTC)