Talk:Whipped (2000 film)

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Vocabulary question

Question from a non native English speaker, is there a specific name for the kind of top, which Amanda Peet is wearing on the movie poster ?Hektor 08:05, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Whipped 2000.jpg

Image:Whipped 2000.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:20, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale included. Hektor 07:15, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to Psychological Manipulation?

I am not sure if this would be appropriate for this article, so I'd like to know what others think before editing.

Some articles concerning movies tend to be quite analytical, and provide a good insight about the plot, symbolism and interpretations. However in some cases this could be perceived as original research (which I agree wikipedia is not the place for that).

Nonetheless, upon watching this movie, I couldn't stop to notice striking traces of Psychological manipulation by the character played by Amanda Peet, which seems to go on pair with the basic manipulative strategies of a psychopath proposed by Hare and Babiak.

I was wondering if it would be worth, as a minimum, to add a see also section pointing to Psychological manipulation. --Pinnecco (talk) 19:52, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]